Whereas it took 7-zip 40 minutes to create the. So, then, why don’t backup programs take 7-zip’s compression capabilities and implement it in their respective programs? After all, 7-zip is open source so that shouldn’t be a problem. Not only did 7-zip create a smaller sized backup than EASEUS Todo Backup v2 – which backed up the same 6.01 GB – but it created a smaller sized backup of more data than what the other previously mentioned five programs could do with less data.ħ-zip clearly blows all other backup programs out of the water when it comes to compression. Rather, I just want to point out how well 7-zip works.) Using 7-zip, at “Ultra” compression with LZMA2, I was able to take that same 6.01 GB of data and create a 2.40 GB. (It must be noted that how well programs can compress data depends on the type of data I am not trying to make you think “wow backup programs compress terribly”. Yesterday I introduced EASEUS Todo Backup v2, which was able to compress 6.01 GB of data down to 5.24 GB. When I wrote the article, the best out of the lot was Acronis True Image Home with an output file size of 4.29 GB (i.e. In my Paragon Backup & Restore Free vs Macrium Reflect Free vs EASEUS Todo Backup vs DriveImage XML vs Acronis True Image Home article, I showed results of how well those software compressed 4.77 GB of data at their highest possible compression settings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |